It seems that this movie was intended to depict much more depth than it has managed to convey. Rohan, the director is experimental and kudos to him for that. He has tried to present a â€˜neither very generic nor very differentâ€™ storyline with a different concept i.e. by using the element of theatre aka â€˜nautankiâ€™. Genre of the movie is comedy and this comedy is different from others as it is not primarily dialogue based but situation and expression based. Also somewhere, the director has tried to use the theatre â€˜nautankiâ€™ as the metaphor for the mother of all â€˜nautankisâ€™ i.e. life itself! The movie constantly shifts between these two parallels. Backdrop of the former is modern day â€˜Ramayanaâ€™ (most esteemed Hindu epic) and that of the latter is the protagonist trying to heal a suicidal â€˜stranger turned dependent turned friendâ€™ by finding his former love and giving him work so that he attaches some worth to himself. The essence of the story is basically situational misunderstanding. In spite of all his noble intentions and sacrifices, the protagonist is misunderstood by his partner, love and also friend! Reason for the same are age old human errors of - mixing task and emotion, undertaking an activity without giving a thought to its obvious result, trespassing territories etc.
Ayushmann, and Kunaal have acted well. Evelyn has some screen presence. The power of modern day theatre could have been presented in a more powerful and enhanced format. Also, the heroines could have been better. Some comedy scenes are really funny and some are original as well. Last but not the least, herein again you miss the element of complete showmanship. Are there no successors of Mr. Subhash Ghai and Late Mr. Yash Chopra?