<span class=normal>However, trouble began when it came down to handing over the Censor certificate to the film. Apparently, Censor board felt that the film was not at all suitable for underage audiences and hence was willing to grant only an A certificate if the film was to be retained as it is. When Madhur asked for reasons, they came up with such a long list of objectionable scenes and dialogues that it completely flabbergasted the filmmaker, who has made a career out of depicting reality on screen. <BR><BR><br><p class=clear>&nbsp;</p>Madhur really didnt know what hit him because he was quite sure that Censors would keep the theme of Jail in mind before passing the verdict. He was not at all expecting the A certificate and the cuts suggested by the Censors were unacceptable to him. He felt that it was unfair on his movie since he had made it after such an extensive research. He couldnt fathom why Censors were being harsh on the film when his intention was not to glamorize the entire jail world or give rise to any scandals, recounts the source. <BR><BR><br><p class=clear>&nbsp;</p>So what were these objectionable points in the film that have resulted in such hue and cry? And whats the counter argument given by the makers of Jail? Lets have a look: </span>